Privilege used to have a general meaning, that you had achieved a right by education, promotion, or sheer hard work. There was a clear pathway, others could see how you got there, and it generally revolved around integrity. But privilege was also connected to a process through community of some description. To be a leader meant that others knew you, knew you had integrity, knew you were for real. In education, especially tertiary, one must be constantly in dialogue and in research and writing, peer reviewed, and of those who worked hard it was that they had rubbed shoulders with many and got their hands dirty in the area or topic they were passionate about.

I’m not American, but I’m concerned that America has descended to privilege those not entitled to be. Take the case of the current president of the U.S. Donald Trump, a business celebrity who appears to be incapable of being a state-like leader. Of course there are a number of theories as to how he got elected:

  • Tough talk in a time of weak talk.
  • Promises to the disappearing middle-class.
  • Playing the race fear card.
  • Tough talk on defence.
  • Rhetoric: Make America Great Again
  • Crass talk: playing up the larikin male.
  • Religious manipulation: playing up to conservative Christians.
  • Not being Hilary: the backlash on privilege factor.
  • Voter participation was low.

And they’re just a few. I think tick all would apply. It says to me that, irrespective of who he is, Trump didn’t get there by hard work, education, or promotion. In my view, he has no integrity because he is clearly manipulative rather than consistent or open. Part of his getting there was his public persona, so he has traded on his celebrity status (if you’re thinking about Ronald Reagan, no matter your view of him, at least he got involved in state politics and worked at it).

Then comes the #Me Too campaign, an important step forward for victims of sexual abuse (and shameful for leaders, entertainers and others privileged by power). And up pops Oprah Winfrey. Now I quite like some of her interviews and some of her book recommendations, however, I really wonder if her Golden Globe moment (and I loved her speech) wasn’t with a view to self privilege, I have questioned if this was a deleiberate act (and maybe it was selfless). And I wonder that those Democrats who decried the nomination of Trump as shallow because he was a celebrity, are now being hyocritical by suggesting the nomination of Oprah to run for president.

My own view is that both Trump and Oprah are being privileged by status, power and money, neither are really political nor really connected to the real process of legislative leadership.

And it is my view that Trump and Oprah are constructs in the public mind, they are who the public want (need?) them to be, when more than likely, they are not anything like that nor capable of being like that (who is?). In the hands of poltical parties they are a product that can be marketed and thus consumed. My fave actor is Juliette Binoche, but while I love her work and some of her opinions, I wouldn’t want her to be president or prime minister simply based on my fascination for her as an actor. Same goes for the really wealthy, for example; Bill Gates, Warren Buffet. It leaves me thinking that celebrity is privileged not just by status and wealth, but also by liminance – that they evoke in us a warmth, a fondness, a feeling not unlike falling in love.

Privileging a leader is also about gain, those who privilege want to be privileged, a never ending sychophantic cycle.

So where is the integrity in leadership? And who will speak for those not privileged (including our friends – nature)? Who will set aside privilege in order to lead?



Filed under community, Philosophy/Theology, politics

21 responses to “Privilege

  1. everybody wants some sort of privilege and most don’t want to do anything to have the privilege….

    Liked by 2 people

  2. This American thinks you are absolutely correct!

    Liked by 2 people

  3. We keep supporting others with more mature/intelligent and (above all) caring views. You would not believe all the crass, prejudiced people who (all over) still support Trump. Really a sad Nazi-like hate movement existing in this day and age!

    Liked by 1 person

  4. interesting view point that seems interrelated to my ‘candid discussion’ post … your last few questions are the powerful ones that do need to be answered soon!

    Liked by 1 person

  5. MNL

    I am an American and sad to say it’s too expensive to immigrate for 4 years while we wait out a crazy term. I do think a large factor in some people voting for Trump is he was a TV star and some people feel like that means they know him. Normally I would think it crazy to run Oprah but if it gets him out, I am all for it. At least on the TV celebrity thing, they are on equal footing. To give her her due, I don’t think Oprah will threaten to blow up the planet just to prove how tough she is so that’s a major plus in my book.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Yes, if you’re going celebrity, Oprah is inteligent and mindful, and a class above Trump. And yes if she’s the lever … 4 years is a long time under sufferance. I do agree that celebrity is very familiar – perhaps that’s what makes it so dangerous.

      Liked by 1 person

  6. perhaps it’s not about privilege at all, rather than realising that no matter who we put in power our expectations cannot be met. and maybe self governance is the way to do it, putting a hold on our own privilege and working with our communities and those around us.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.